Перейти к основному содержимому

State of JavaScript 2023

Библиотеки

We reworked our charts to highlight not just developer experience, but sentiment. Be sure to explore these new grouping and sorting options to figure out which libraries get the most love… or the least!

Libraries Experience & Sentiment

Group by:

Sort by:

1

90.1%
8.9%
19,077
2

84.4%
15.5%
21,619
3

74.3%
21.1%
4.6%
19,682
4

73.3%
21.3%
5.4%
19,220
5

57.1%
41.8%
20,828
6

52.2%
12.6%
35.2%
19,014
7

52%
34.4%
13.5%
19,762
8

50.7%
32.2%
17.1%
19,010
9

50.1%
49.5%
21,589
10

47.1%
40%
12.8%
19,713

Experience

  • Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
  • Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
  • Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.

Sentiment

  • Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
  • Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
  • Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
“Used” average:26%
“Positive” average:38%
“Negative” average:28%

Изменения с течением времени

X-axis rangeНегативное отношениеПоложительное отношениеY-axis rangeИспользовалНе использовалReact. Velocity: 37.62. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.react, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (68.52%), (5.28%)react, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (69.36%), (23.93%)react, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (67.98%), (43.03%)react, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (67.42%), (60.48%)react, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (63.24%), (60.03%)react, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (53.13%), (59.81%)react, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (52.86%), (63.52%)react, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (42.61%), (68.81%)Vue.js. Velocity: 97.52. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.vuejs, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (8.91%), (-79.95%)vuejs, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (47.39%), (-56.96%)vuejs, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (52.2%), (-36.72%)vuejs, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (49.65%), (-7.19%)vuejs, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (46.96%), (-2.04%)vuejs, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (30.63%), (2.39%)vuejs, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (25.88%), (-7.74%)vuejs, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (26.25%), (0.22%)Angular. Velocity: 9.32. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.angular, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (7.76%), (-60.04%)angular, 2017:Mostly negative opinions (-10.26%), (-43.16%)angular, 2018:Mostly negative opinions (-31.44%), (15.44%)angular, 2019:Mostly negative opinions (-36.54%), (15.44%)angular, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-35.04%), (11.6%)angular, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-36.54%), (7.82%)angular, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-37.28%), (-2.5%)angular, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-34.64%), (-8.32%)Preact. Velocity: -0.68. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.preact, 2018:Mostly negative opinions (-4.48%), (-85.1%)preact, 2019:Mostly negative opinions (-5.39%), (-75.64%)preact, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-5.74%), (-73.15%)preact, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-17.48%), (-71.95%)preact, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-12.11%), (-74.44%)preact, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-17.73%), (-72.53%)Svelte. Velocity: 52.5. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.svelte, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (28.2%), (-84.45%)svelte, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (34.31%), (-70.9%)svelte, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (42.29%), (-60.32%)svelte, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (45.3%), (-57.8%)svelte, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (44.65%), (-48.4%)Alpine.js. Velocity: -2.03. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.alpinejs, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-5.47%), (-93.31%)alpinejs, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-10.94%), (-88.6%)alpinejs, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-12.58%), (-87.8%)alpinejs, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-16.14%), (-84.67%)Lit. Velocity: 1.85. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.litelement, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-1.59%), (-89.23%)litelement, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-2.29%), (-85.92%)litelement, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-6.88%), (-87.73%)litelement, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-4.8%), (-84.17%)Solid. Velocity: 21.89. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.solid, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (6.02%), (-94.44%)solid, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (23.7%), (-87.53%)solid, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (15.57%), (-82.09%)Qwik. Velocity: -8.95. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.qwik, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (17.05%), (-96.41%)qwik, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (3.53%), (-91.83%)Stencil. Velocity: -7.05. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.stencil, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-9.72%), (-91.42%)stencil, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-17.23%), (-90.97%)Next.js. Velocity: 103.62. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.nextjs, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (24.14%), (-80.42%)nextjs, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (49.52%), (-45.5%)nextjs, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (55.25%), (-26.64%)nextjs, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (53.1%), (-10.28%)nextjs, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (53.66%), (-2.91%)nextjs, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (33.22%), (14.12%)Nuxt. Velocity: 5.65. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.nuxt, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (9.77%), (-66.34%)nuxt, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (8.19%), (-60.42%)nuxt, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (5.26%), (-63.96%)nuxt, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (2.19%), (-53.1%)Gatsby. Velocity: -89.84. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.gatsby, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (36.2%), (-50.36%)gatsby, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (16.23%), (-43.76%)gatsby, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-12.45%), (-46.49%)gatsby, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-28.12%), (-54.18%)gatsby, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-50%), (-54%)Remix. Velocity: -9.02. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.remix, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (23.13%), (-90.13%)remix, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (13.43%), (-84.42%)remix, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (3.14%), (-79.16%)Astro. Velocity: 51.5. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.astro, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (11.44%), (-93.5%)astro, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (26.54%), (-82.41%)astro, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (31.33%), (-61.89%)Eleventy. Velocity: -21.17. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.eleventy, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (1.88%), (-87.84%)eleventy, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-9.66%), (-89.28%)eleventy, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-18.42%), (-88.72%)SvelteKit. Velocity: 15.27. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.sveltekit, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (27.73%), (-80.31%)sveltekit, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (29.52%), (-76.26%)sveltekit, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (27.09%), (-64.4%)Docusaurus. Velocity: -3.43. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.docusaurus, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (8.56%), (-83.28%)docusaurus, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (1.25%), (-79.41%)Jest. Velocity: 177.26. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.jest, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (6.44%), (-84%)jest, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (42.04%), (-47.24%)jest, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (58.96%), (-17.8%)jest, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (76.62%), (27.01%)jest, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (78.95%), (36.59%)jest, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (75.26%), (45.39%)jest, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (64.98%), (36.54%)jest, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (51.11%), (48.59%)Mocha. Velocity: -75.47. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.mocha, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (62.19%), (-2.98%)mocha, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (55.53%), (3.54%)mocha, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (41.56%), (-4.2%)mocha, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (36.4%), (8.14%)mocha, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (28.63%), (5.41%)mocha, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (14.57%), (0.52%)mocha, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (9.26%), (-12.42%)mocha, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-7.13%), (-9.13%)Storybook. Velocity: 83.77. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.storybook, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (31.26%), (-65.34%)storybook, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (47.83%), (-29.89%)storybook, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (53.06%), (-15.72%)storybook, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (52.75%), (-4.15%)storybook, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (46.97%), (-10.75%)storybook, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (45.59%), (4.09%)Cypress. Velocity: 30.64. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.cypress, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (41.46%), (-48.86%)cypress, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (51.62%), (-29.83%)cypress, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (53.55%), (-14.6%)cypress, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (44.64%), (-15.49%)cypress, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (29%), (-5.76%)Puppeteer. Velocity: 8.22. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.puppeteer, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (36.03%), (-45.42%)puppeteer, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (37.54%), (-33.02%)puppeteer, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (30.27%), (-26.11%)puppeteer, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (22.35%), (-31.36%)puppeteer, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (19.91%), (-21.08%)Testing Library. Velocity: 27.77. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.testing_library, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (33.11%), (-47.15%)testing_library, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (42.59%), (-29.66%)testing_library, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (38.58%), (-30.77%)testing_library, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (33.64%), (-19.89%)Playwright. Velocity: 94.03. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.playwright, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (8.83%), (-93.38%)playwright, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (17.67%), (-81.02%)playwright, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (30.42%), (-68.54%)playwright, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (49.94%), (-40.46%)WebdriverIO. Velocity: -10.4. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.webdriverio, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-0.52%), (-80.09%)webdriverio, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-5.14%), (-80.48%)webdriverio, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-6.16%), (-82.65%)webdriverio, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-8.57%), (-82.45%)Vitest. Velocity: 99. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.vitest, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (16.75%), (-94.65%)vitest, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (30.87%), (-71.88%)vitest, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (54.64%), (-33.54%)Selenium. Velocity: -14.66. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.selenium, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-11.72%), (-33.01%)selenium, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-34.29%), (-25.1%)TestCafe. Velocity: -4.63. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.testcafe, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-6.83%), (-92.05%)testcafe, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-12.54%), (-90.97%)Electron. Velocity: 2.35. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.electron, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (52.93%), (-55.02%)electron, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (54.38%), (-55.04%)electron, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (50.34%), (-40.22%)electron, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (52.68%), (-33.61%)electron, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (39.2%), (-28.04%)electron, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (30.38%), (-29.76%)electron, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (22.12%), (-21.86%)React Native. Velocity: 10.32. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.reactnative, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (54.34%), (-72.23%)reactnative, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (58.39%), (-56.78%)reactnative, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (46.15%), (-55.34%)reactnative, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (44.53%), (-33.84%)reactnative, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (39.02%), (-30.18%)reactnative, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (25.43%), (-31.92%)reactnative, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (24.16%), (-29.98%)reactnative, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (17.47%), (-25.04%)Native Apps. Velocity: -48.17. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.nativeapps, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (42.51%), (-29.56%)nativeapps, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (48.97%), (-21.97%)nativeapps, 2018:Mostly positive opinions (5.47%), (-73.08%)nativeapps, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (21.53%), (-63.36%)nativeapps, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (13.34%), (-74.78%)nativeapps, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (11.8%), (-62.48%)nativeapps, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (17.3%), (-59.86%)nativeapps, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (6.72%), (-41.94%)Cordova. Velocity: -65.06. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.cordova, 2016:Mostly negative opinions (-4.09%), (-31.29%)cordova, 2017:Mostly negative opinions (-30.54%), (-31.96%)cordova, 2018:Mostly negative opinions (-42.09%), (-40.35%)cordova, 2019:Mostly negative opinions (-43.23%), (-38.01%)cordova, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-42.54%), (-31.58%)cordova, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-48.35%), (-35.57%)cordova, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-42.84%), (-49.89%)cordova, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-52.49%), (-47.95%)Ionic. Velocity: -5.81. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.ionic, 2017:Mostly negative opinions (-11.97%), (-59.34%)ionic, 2018:Mostly negative opinions (-24.34%), (-67.66%)ionic, 2019:Mostly negative opinions (-23.94%), (-53.36%)ionic, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-18.68%), (-42.32%)ionic, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-19.73%), (-42.65%)ionic, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-24.11%), (-54.01%)ionic, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-26.42%), (-50.7%)Capacitor. Velocity: -2.53. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.capacitor, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (5.09%), (-80.95%)capacitor, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (5.27%), (-72.55%)capacitor, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-2.29%), (-78.26%)capacitor, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-4.2%), (-74.19%)NW.js. Velocity: -0.52. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.nwjs, 2019:Mostly negative opinions (-12.3%), (-90.66%)nwjs, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-8.89%), (-91.15%)nwjs, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-11.11%), (-91.5%)nwjs, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-10.26%), (-92.27%)nwjs, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-11.11%), (-92.38%)Expo. Velocity: 20.22. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.expo, 2019:Mostly positive opinions (7.17%), (-60.09%)expo, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (11.55%), (-53.17%)expo, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (9.3%), (-53.99%)expo, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (10.43%), (-52.8%)expo, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (12.37%), (-45.07%)Quasar. Velocity: -1.58. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.quasar, 2020:Mostly negative opinions (-2.89%), (-92.96%)quasar, 2021:Mostly negative opinions (-5.27%), (-91.02%)quasar, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-6.04%), (-91.81%)quasar, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-8.38%), (-89.05%)Tauri. Velocity: 31.6. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.tauri, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (7.18%), (-96.48%)tauri, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (16.98%), (-89.54%)tauri, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (23.99%), (-81.69%)NativeScript. Velocity: -1.43. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.nativescript, 2016:Mostly negative opinions (-0.48%), (-93.06%)nativescript, 2017:Mostly negative opinions (-5.45%), (-92.14%)nativescript, 2018:Mostly negative opinions (-8.58%), (-94.63%)nativescript, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-3.19%), (-90.25%)nativescript, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-6.88%), (-88.1%)webpack. Velocity: 0.39. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.webpack, 2016:Mostly positive opinions (66.01%), (6.39%)webpack, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (81.67%), (46.16%)webpack, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (71.91%), (77.37%)webpack, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (47.42%), (78.37%)webpack, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (25.17%), (69.55%)webpack, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-7.32%), (80.12%)Parcel. Velocity: -32.76. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.parcel, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (32.1%), (-45.24%)parcel, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (25.89%), (-37.96%)parcel, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (8.9%), (-45.64%)parcel, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-4.58%), (-41.32%)Rollup. Velocity: 78.91. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.rollup, 2017:Mostly positive opinions (14.6%), (-78.44%)rollup, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (28.32%), (-39.82%)rollup, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (28.62%), (-22.12%)rollup, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (18.73%), (-27.31%)rollup, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (27.16%), (-12.09%)tsc CLI. Velocity: -46.5. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.tsc, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (59.13%), (23.38%)tsc, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (76.87%), (57.32%)tsc, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (38.36%), (-2.9%)tsc, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (31.71%), (4.3%)SWC. Velocity: 76.97. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.swc, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (1.85%), (-98.23%)swc, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (18.45%), (-85.41%)swc, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (17.27%), (-74.73%)swc, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (29.66%), (-49.07%)esbuild. Velocity: 127.2. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.esbuild, 2020:Mostly positive opinions (15.86%), (-89.09%)esbuild, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (48.12%), (-47.48%)esbuild, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (42.47%), (-38.22%)esbuild, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (52.67%), (1.3%)Vite. Velocity: 117.47. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.vite, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (52.01%), (-40.11%)vite, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (68.76%), (-2.56%)vite, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (82.74%), (46.63%)Turbopack. Velocity: 8.16. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.turbopack, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (37.31%), (-89.57%)turbopack, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (23.23%), (-67.31%)Rush. Velocity: -2.85. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.rush, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (2.1%), (-97.09%)rush, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-0.1%), (-97.03%)rush, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-2.16%), (-95.68%)Turborepo. Velocity: 32.23. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.turborepo, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (18.11%), (-94.9%)turborepo, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (26.74%), (-82.91%)turborepo, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (23.48%), (-68.04%)Yarn Workspaces. Velocity: -13.69. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.yarn_workspaces, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (20.88%), (-49.98%)yarn_workspaces, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (16.54%), (-47.48%)yarn_workspaces, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-2.35%), (-40.44%)Yalc. Velocity: -1.12. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.yalc, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (0.35%), (-95.54%)yalc, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-1.12%), (-94.95%)yalc, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-3.13%), (-93.19%)Lerna. Velocity: -25.45. Overall more positive opinions and/or usage over time.lerna, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (8.02%), (-49.42%)lerna, 2022:Mostly negative opinions (-4.72%), (-56.92%)lerna, 2023:Mostly negative opinions (-16.23%), (-50.62%)npm Workspaces. Velocity: 16.68. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.npm_workspaces, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (24.32%), (-63.82%)npm_workspaces, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (23.18%), (-48.21%)npm_workspaces, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (14.93%), (-37.74%)pnpm. Velocity: 80.7. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.pnpm, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (22.65%), (-75%)pnpm, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (29.64%), (-57.49%)pnpm, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (45.85%), (-17.5%)Nx. Velocity: 17.28. Overall more negative opinions and/or less usage over time.nx, 2021:Mostly positive opinions (16.72%), (-75.18%)nx, 2022:Mostly positive opinions (16.77%), (-67.95%)nx, 2023:Mostly positive opinions (16.57%), (-57.76%)

Легенда

Рост популярности

Падение популярности

  • По определённым технологиям отсутствуют данные за некоторые года.
  • Не показываются технологии с данными только за один год.
  • Формула скорости = (самое последнее мнение - самое старое мнение) + (самое последнее использование) - (самое старое использование).
  • Положительная скорость означает, что использование и/или положительные мнения увеличились с течением времени.
We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

My 2023 Pick: localfirst.fm

If you're interested in where software is heading, this podcast is required listening. It'll renew your optimism about the future of web development.
We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

Rich Harris

Open source troublemaker at Vercel. Creator of Rollup and Svelte

Рейтинг библиотек

Фронтенд-фреймворки
Meta-Frameworks
Тестирование
Мобильные устройства и десктоп
Сборщики
Инструменты для монорепозиториев
S
90%
98%
Vite
97%
Vitest
95%
Playwright
92%
pnpm
92%
Mock Service Worker
91%
esbuild
90%
SWC
90%
Testing Library
90%
Astro
A
80%
89%
SvelteKit
86%
Svelte
83%
Turborepo
82%
tsc CLI
81%
Storybook
80%
Turbopack
80%
Rollup
B
60%
79%
Jest
76%
Nuxt
76%
Next.js
76%
React
75%
Nx
75%
Vue.js
73%
Expo
72%
npm Workspaces
72%
Puppeteer
71%
Cypress
69%
React Native
67%
Electron
66%
Preact
65%
Capacitor
60%
Yarn Workspaces
C
56.00000000000001%
Parcel
52%
Mocha
46%
webpack
42%
Angular
39%
Ionic
36%
Lerna
30%
Selenium
21%
Gatsby
15%
Cordova

На этой диаграмме библиотеки ранжированы по коэффициенту удовлетворённости (процент пользователей, которые бы снова воспользовались библиотекой). Обратите внимание, в списке участвуют библиотеки, которые упомянули более 10% респондентов.

Retention vs Usage

Фронтенд-фреймворки
Meta-Frameworks
Тестирование
Мобильные устройства и десктоп
Сборщики
Инструменты для монорепозиториев

Эта диаграмма показывает процент удовлетворённости каждой технологией относительно её общего количества пользователей. Делится на на четыре квадранта:

  • ПРОБУЮТ: Низкая степень использования, высокая степень удовлетворённости. Технологии, на которые стоит обратить внимание.

  • ПРИМЕНЯЮТ: Высокая степень использования, высокая степень удовлетворённости. Технологии, которые можно спокойно применять.

  • ИЗБЕГАЮТ: Низкая степень использования, высокая степень удовлетворённости. Технологии, которые лучше избегать в настоящий момент.

  • ОЦЕНИВАЮТ: Высокая степень использования, низкая степень удовлетворённости. Технологии, от которых, возможно, стоит отказаться.

Рекомендуемые ресурсы

Vite
Steve Kinney
Temporal

Vite

Tour Vite's capabilities include bundling, optimizing static assets, hot module reloading, and its rich plugin ecosystem. Integrate Vite with popular frameworks like React and Svelte and leverage dynamic imports for code splitting.
Design Systems with Storybook, v2
Steve Kinney
Temporal

Design Systems with Storybook, v2

Create reusable UI components with composable styles and variants using Tailwind CSS. Use MDX for documentation, set up interaction testing, and add data fetching to create a robust dev environment for your component library.
Спасибо нашим партнёрам за поддержку! Подробнее.